Cómo citar
Factores de riesgo asociados a sensibilidad dental en el tratamiento con protésis dental fija: Revision de literature. (2019). Odontoestomatología, 21(33). https://odon.edu.uy/ojs/index.php/ode/article/view/269
Resumen
Las piezas dentarias vitales que reciben tratamiento en base a prótesis dental fija (PDF) sufren un proceso inflamatorio pulpar durante su preparación, esta respuesta inflamatoria puede ser transitoria o perpetuarse y convertirse en un daño pulpar. Como consecuencia se puede presentar sensibilidad post operatoria en algunos pacientes durante el tratamiento y esta podría estar relacionada con ciertos factores de riesgo. El objetivo del presente trabajo es describir los factores de riesgo relacionados con la sensibilidad postoperatoria termica, quimica o mecanica en el tratamiento mediante prótesis dental fija.
Método: Se utilizaron diferentes bases de datos para buscar estudios que incluyeran las siguientes palabras clave: sensibilidad dental, hipersensibilidad dental, respuesta pulpar, corona, prótesis fija, postoperatorio, post cementación, preparación dentaria. Todos los estudios encontrados se analizaron según el nivel de evidencia, la calidad del informe y las implicaciones éticas.
Resultados: Se seleccionaron un total de 43 artículos. De ellos, 10 correspondieron a estudios clínicos, 7 revisiones de literatura y 26 estudios in vitro. El nivel de evidencia, la calidad del informe y las consideraciones éticas fueron calificados como regulares.
Conclusiones: La evidencia existente describe algunos factores de riesgo relacionados con la sensibilidad postoperatoria en tres etapas del proceso de confección de una prótesis dental fija, pero sin embargo no es concluyente respecto a su mecanismo de origen ni prevención por lo que se sugiere realizar estudios clínicos aleatorizados.
Referencias
1. Yu C & Abbott P An overview of the dental pulp: its functions and responses to injury Aus dent J. 2007; 52 (s1): s4-16.
2. Chung G, Jung S, Oh S. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of dental nociception J dent res. 2013; 92 (11): 948-955.
3. Brännström M The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome J of end. 1986;12 (10): 453-457.
4. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH.Vías de la pulpa.10 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2011. 1004 p.
5. Johnson GH, Powell L, DeRouen T. Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements JADA. 1993;124 (11):38-46.
6. Lockard MW. A retrospective study of pulpal response in vital adult teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed using only air coolan.t J of Prost Dent. 2002; 88 (5): 473-478.
7. Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Lynch CD, Fleming PS, Pereira-Cenci T. Moher D Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. J Dent. 2015; 43 (4): 397-404.
8. Faggion CM. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J of Evid Prac. 2012; 12 (4): 182-189.
9. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J of Pros Dent. 1965; 15 (1): 129-143.
10. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Postcementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions. J of Prost. 2003; 12 (2): 73-81.
11. Öztürk B, Üşümez A, Öztürk AN & Ozer F In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation. J of Prost Dent. 2004; 91 (5): 436-440.
12. Ottl P & Lauer H-C. Temperature response in the pulpal chamber during ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation with diamond burs of different grit. J of Prost Dent. 1998; 80 (1): 12-19.
13. Lauer H-C, Kraft E, Rothlauf W, Zwingers T. Effects of the temperature of cooling water during high-speed and ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation. J of Prost Dent. 1990; 63 (4): 407-414.
14. Ercoli C, Rotella M, Funkenbusch PD, Russell S, Feng C. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine .J of Prost Dent. 2009; 101 (4): 248-261.
15. Galindo DF, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Greene TD, Moss ME, Lee HJ, Ben‐Hanan U, Graser GN, Barzilay I. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs. J of Prost. 2004;13 (1): 3-16.
16. Murray P, Smith A, Garcia‐Godoy F, Lumley P. Comparison of operative procedure variables on pulpal viability in an ex vivo model. Int end j. 2008; 41 (5):389-400.
17. Murray PE, Smith A, Windsor L, Mjör I. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int end j. 2003; 36 (1): 33-43.
18. Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation. J of Prost Dent. 1991; 4 (3): 219-25
19. Yadav K, Sofat A, Gambhir RS, Galhotra V. Dentin hypersensitivity following tooth preparation: A clinical study in the spectrum of gender. J nat sci. 2014; 5 (1): 21-4.
20. Outhwaite W, Livingston M, Pashley DH. Effects of changes in surface area, thickness, temperature and post-extraction time on human dentine permeability Arc of Or Biol. 1976; 21 (10): 599-603.
21. Abu-Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Agee K, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review. Am J Dent. 2015; 6: 321–332
22. Davis GR, Tayeb RA, Seymour KG, Cherukara GP. Quantification of residual dentine thickness following crown preparation. J of dent. 2012; 40 (7): 571-576.
23. Viţalariu A, Căruntu I-D, Bolintineanu S. Morphological changes in dental pulp after the teeth preparation procedure. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2005; 46 (2): 131-136.
24. Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, Ferguson WM. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restorations. J of Prost Dent. 1991; 65 (4): 504-506.
25. Chadda AS, Verma P, Nagpal A, Samra RK, Verma R & Katna V Evaluation Of Temperature Changes In Pulp Chamber During Direct Temporization Using Different Combinations Of Provisional Crown & Impression Materials-An In Vitro Study Ind. J of Dent Sci. 2012; 4 (5): 23-27.
26. Lieu C, Nguyen T-M, Payant L In vitro comparison of peak polymerization temperatures of 5 provisional restoration resins. J-Can Dent Ass. 2001; 67 (1): 36-39.
27. Moulding M, Teplitsky P. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J of Prost Dent. 1990; 3 (3): 299-304.
28. Altintas SH, Yondem I, Tak O, Usumez A. Temperature rise during polymerization of three different provisional materials. Clin oral inv. 2008; 12 (3): 283-286.
29. Xie C, Wang Z-y, He H-m, Han Y. In vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during fabrication of provisional restorations on different types of teeth. Int Chin J Dent. 2007;7 69-74.
30. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, Kang K & Kafantaris N. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J of Prost Dent. 2006; 96 (6): 418-423.
31. Kim S-h, Watts DC. Exotherm behavior of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mat. 2004; 20 (4):383-387.
32. Tjan AH, Grant BE, Godfrey MF. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional crowns. J of Prost Dent. 1989; 62 (6): 622-626.
33. Manak E, Arora A. A Comparative evaluation of temperature changes in the pulpal chamber during direct fabrication of provisional restorations: an in vitro study J of Ind Prosth Soc. 2011;11 (3):149-155.
34. Chiodera G, Gastaldi G, Millar BJ. Temperature change in pulp cavity in vitro during the polymerization of provisional resins Dent mat. 2009; 25 (3): 321-325.
35. Tapia Silva R, Valenzuela Aránguiz V, Zamorano Pino X, Baena Águila R. Cuantificación de la generación térmica en acrílicos de autopolimerización. Avances en Odont. 2010; 26 (2):91-96.
36. Seelbach P, Finger WJ, Ferger P, Balkenhol M. Temperature rise on dentin caused by temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials: influencing factors. J of dent. 2010; 38 (12): 964-973.
37. Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB. Comparative analysis of postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin cement: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13 (3): 327-331.
38. Hassan SH, Azad AA, Niaz O, Amjad M, Akram J, Riaz W. Post cementation sensitivity in vital abutments of metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Pak Or & Dent J. 2011;31 (1):1009-13.
39. Bebermeyer RD, Berg JH Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Quint Int. 1994;25 (3):209-14.
40. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller H-G, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J of Prost Dent. 1996;75 (2):159-162.
41. Saad DE-D, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. The postoperative sensitivity of fixed partial dentures cemented with self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical study JADA. 2010;141 (12):1459-1466.
42. Blatz MB, Mante FK, Saleh N, Atlas AM, Mannan S, Ozer F. Postoperative tooth sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement—a randomized clinical trial Clin or Inves. 2013;17 (3):793-798.
43. Lam CW, Wilson P. The effect of dentine surface treatment on pulpward pressure transmission during crown cementation: a laboratory study Int dent j. 1998;48 (3):196-202.
2. Chung G, Jung S, Oh S. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of dental nociception J dent res. 2013; 92 (11): 948-955.
3. Brännström M The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome J of end. 1986;12 (10): 453-457.
4. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH.Vías de la pulpa.10 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2011. 1004 p.
5. Johnson GH, Powell L, DeRouen T. Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements JADA. 1993;124 (11):38-46.
6. Lockard MW. A retrospective study of pulpal response in vital adult teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed using only air coolan.t J of Prost Dent. 2002; 88 (5): 473-478.
7. Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Lynch CD, Fleming PS, Pereira-Cenci T. Moher D Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. J Dent. 2015; 43 (4): 397-404.
8. Faggion CM. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J of Evid Prac. 2012; 12 (4): 182-189.
9. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J of Pros Dent. 1965; 15 (1): 129-143.
10. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Postcementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions. J of Prost. 2003; 12 (2): 73-81.
11. Öztürk B, Üşümez A, Öztürk AN & Ozer F In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation. J of Prost Dent. 2004; 91 (5): 436-440.
12. Ottl P & Lauer H-C. Temperature response in the pulpal chamber during ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation with diamond burs of different grit. J of Prost Dent. 1998; 80 (1): 12-19.
13. Lauer H-C, Kraft E, Rothlauf W, Zwingers T. Effects of the temperature of cooling water during high-speed and ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation. J of Prost Dent. 1990; 63 (4): 407-414.
14. Ercoli C, Rotella M, Funkenbusch PD, Russell S, Feng C. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine .J of Prost Dent. 2009; 101 (4): 248-261.
15. Galindo DF, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Greene TD, Moss ME, Lee HJ, Ben‐Hanan U, Graser GN, Barzilay I. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs. J of Prost. 2004;13 (1): 3-16.
16. Murray P, Smith A, Garcia‐Godoy F, Lumley P. Comparison of operative procedure variables on pulpal viability in an ex vivo model. Int end j. 2008; 41 (5):389-400.
17. Murray PE, Smith A, Windsor L, Mjör I. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int end j. 2003; 36 (1): 33-43.
18. Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation. J of Prost Dent. 1991; 4 (3): 219-25
19. Yadav K, Sofat A, Gambhir RS, Galhotra V. Dentin hypersensitivity following tooth preparation: A clinical study in the spectrum of gender. J nat sci. 2014; 5 (1): 21-4.
20. Outhwaite W, Livingston M, Pashley DH. Effects of changes in surface area, thickness, temperature and post-extraction time on human dentine permeability Arc of Or Biol. 1976; 21 (10): 599-603.
21. Abu-Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Agee K, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review. Am J Dent. 2015; 6: 321–332
22. Davis GR, Tayeb RA, Seymour KG, Cherukara GP. Quantification of residual dentine thickness following crown preparation. J of dent. 2012; 40 (7): 571-576.
23. Viţalariu A, Căruntu I-D, Bolintineanu S. Morphological changes in dental pulp after the teeth preparation procedure. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2005; 46 (2): 131-136.
24. Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, Ferguson WM. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restorations. J of Prost Dent. 1991; 65 (4): 504-506.
25. Chadda AS, Verma P, Nagpal A, Samra RK, Verma R & Katna V Evaluation Of Temperature Changes In Pulp Chamber During Direct Temporization Using Different Combinations Of Provisional Crown & Impression Materials-An In Vitro Study Ind. J of Dent Sci. 2012; 4 (5): 23-27.
26. Lieu C, Nguyen T-M, Payant L In vitro comparison of peak polymerization temperatures of 5 provisional restoration resins. J-Can Dent Ass. 2001; 67 (1): 36-39.
27. Moulding M, Teplitsky P. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J of Prost Dent. 1990; 3 (3): 299-304.
28. Altintas SH, Yondem I, Tak O, Usumez A. Temperature rise during polymerization of three different provisional materials. Clin oral inv. 2008; 12 (3): 283-286.
29. Xie C, Wang Z-y, He H-m, Han Y. In vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during fabrication of provisional restorations on different types of teeth. Int Chin J Dent. 2007;7 69-74.
30. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, Kang K & Kafantaris N. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J of Prost Dent. 2006; 96 (6): 418-423.
31. Kim S-h, Watts DC. Exotherm behavior of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mat. 2004; 20 (4):383-387.
32. Tjan AH, Grant BE, Godfrey MF. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional crowns. J of Prost Dent. 1989; 62 (6): 622-626.
33. Manak E, Arora A. A Comparative evaluation of temperature changes in the pulpal chamber during direct fabrication of provisional restorations: an in vitro study J of Ind Prosth Soc. 2011;11 (3):149-155.
34. Chiodera G, Gastaldi G, Millar BJ. Temperature change in pulp cavity in vitro during the polymerization of provisional resins Dent mat. 2009; 25 (3): 321-325.
35. Tapia Silva R, Valenzuela Aránguiz V, Zamorano Pino X, Baena Águila R. Cuantificación de la generación térmica en acrílicos de autopolimerización. Avances en Odont. 2010; 26 (2):91-96.
36. Seelbach P, Finger WJ, Ferger P, Balkenhol M. Temperature rise on dentin caused by temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials: influencing factors. J of dent. 2010; 38 (12): 964-973.
37. Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB. Comparative analysis of postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin cement: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13 (3): 327-331.
38. Hassan SH, Azad AA, Niaz O, Amjad M, Akram J, Riaz W. Post cementation sensitivity in vital abutments of metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Pak Or & Dent J. 2011;31 (1):1009-13.
39. Bebermeyer RD, Berg JH Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Quint Int. 1994;25 (3):209-14.
40. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller H-G, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J of Prost Dent. 1996;75 (2):159-162.
41. Saad DE-D, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. The postoperative sensitivity of fixed partial dentures cemented with self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical study JADA. 2010;141 (12):1459-1466.
42. Blatz MB, Mante FK, Saleh N, Atlas AM, Mannan S, Ozer F. Postoperative tooth sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement—a randomized clinical trial Clin or Inves. 2013;17 (3):793-798.
43. Lam CW, Wilson P. The effect of dentine surface treatment on pulpward pressure transmission during crown cementation: a laboratory study Int dent j. 1998;48 (3):196-202.