Palabras clave
dientes endodónticamente tratados, onlays adheridos, restauración sin poste, estética, adhesión.
Cómo citar
Endocrown:: Estudio clínico retrospectivo de una serie de pacientes, en un período de 8 a 19 años. (2016). Odontoestomatología, 18(28), 48-60. https://odon.edu.uy/ojs/index.php/ode/article/view/139
Resumen
Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar el resultado clínico retrospectivo de 11 Endocrowns, realizados por el primer autor en su consultorio privado, en un período de 8 a 19 años. Materiales and Métodos: Se establecieron criterios de inclusión y exclusión para la muestra y las restauraciones. En ciento treinta pacientes seleccionados al azar, 11 Endocrowns habían sido realizados en 11 pacientes. Tres materiales restauradores y tres cementos de resina fueron utilizados. Se analizaron diferentes variables. El Indice Kappa de Cohen, referido al análisis de calidad de las restauraciones, tuvo una variación de 0.78 a 1. Para analizar las diferencias estadísticas significativas se utilizaron métodos estadísticos descriptivos. Resultados: Al momento del examen, 10 (90.9%) Endocrowns estaban en función Uno (9.1%) había fracasado. Conclusiones: Endocrown, es un procedimiento restaurador técnicamente sensible, conservador, estético, fácil, rápido, con muy aceptable funcionalidad y longevidad, para rehabilitar dientes posteriores endodónticamente tratados, principalmente molares
Referencias
1. Salvi GE, Siegrist BE, Amsta T, Joss A, Lang NP. Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post and core systems in an specialist practice setting. Int Endod J 2007;40:209-215. [ Links ]
2. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-39. [ Links ]
3. Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lueckel H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported post-endodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 2012;38:432-435. [ Links ]
4. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent 2007;35:778-786. [ Links ]
5. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the mono-block technique. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;5:83-94. [ Links ]
6. Ferencz JL, Silva NRFA, Navarro JM. High-strength ceramics. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2014. [ Links ]
7. Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: A clinical report. Quintessence Int 2008;39:99-106. [ Links ]
8. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: An alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:283-291. [ Links ]
9. Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc 2013;79:d140 [ Links ]
10. Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:446-455. [ Links ]
11. Bernhart J, Bräuning A, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Cerec 3D endocrowns-two-year clinical examination of CAD/CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars. Int J Comput Dent 2010;2:142-154. [ Links ]
12. Otto T, Mörmann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. Int J Comput Dent 2015;2:147-161. [ Links ]
13. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of Ceramic Computer-aided Design/Manufacturing Crowns Bonded to Preparations with Reduced Macroretention Geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:219-224. [ Links ]
14. Cohen J. Weighed Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with prevision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 1968;70:213-220. [ Links ]
15. Fleiss J L. Statiscal methods for rates and proportions (2nd. Ed), New York: John Wiley, 1981:38-46. [ Links ]
16. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358. [ Links ]
19. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post system in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991;17:293-297. [ Links ]
22. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays : effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23:543-555. [ Links ]
25. Sevimli G, Cengiz S, Oruc MS. Endocrowns: Review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2015;2:57-63. [ Links ]
31. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-136. [ Links ]
37. El-Damanhoury H, Haj-Ali R, Platt J. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40(2):201-210. [ Links ]
39. Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M. Microleakage of IPS Empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent 2012;37:417-424. [ Links ]
41. Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:235-241. [ Links ]
45. AlShaafi MM, AlQahtani MQ, Price RB. Effect of exposure time on the polymerization of resin cement through ceramic. J Adhes Dent, 2014;16:129-135. [ Links ]
endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;4:942-948. [ Links ]
2015;17: 11-22 . Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392015000100003&lng=en&tlng=en [ Links ]
practice. Quintessence,1999:13-17. [ Links ]
51. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson A, Johansson A-K. Clinical decision making on extensive molar restorations. Oper Dent 2014;6:231-240. [ Links ]
52. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2009;25:960-968. [ Links ]
2. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-39. [ Links ]
3. Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lueckel H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported post-endodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 2012;38:432-435. [ Links ]
4. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent 2007;35:778-786. [ Links ]
5. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the mono-block technique. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;5:83-94. [ Links ]
6. Ferencz JL, Silva NRFA, Navarro JM. High-strength ceramics. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2014. [ Links ]
7. Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: A clinical report. Quintessence Int 2008;39:99-106. [ Links ]
8. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: An alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:283-291. [ Links ]
9. Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc 2013;79:d140 [ Links ]
10. Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:446-455. [ Links ]
11. Bernhart J, Bräuning A, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Cerec 3D endocrowns-two-year clinical examination of CAD/CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars. Int J Comput Dent 2010;2:142-154. [ Links ]
12. Otto T, Mörmann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. Int J Comput Dent 2015;2:147-161. [ Links ]
13. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of Ceramic Computer-aided Design/Manufacturing Crowns Bonded to Preparations with Reduced Macroretention Geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:219-224. [ Links ]
14. Cohen J. Weighed Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with prevision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 1968;70:213-220. [ Links ]
15. Fleiss J L. Statiscal methods for rates and proportions (2nd. Ed), New York: John Wiley, 1981:38-46. [ Links ]
16. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358. [ Links ]
19. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post system in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991;17:293-297. [ Links ]
22. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays : effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23:543-555. [ Links ]
25. Sevimli G, Cengiz S, Oruc MS. Endocrowns: Review. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2015;2:57-63. [ Links ]
31. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-136. [ Links ]
37. El-Damanhoury H, Haj-Ali R, Platt J. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40(2):201-210. [ Links ]
39. Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M. Microleakage of IPS Empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent 2012;37:417-424. [ Links ]
41. Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:235-241. [ Links ]
45. AlShaafi MM, AlQahtani MQ, Price RB. Effect of exposure time on the polymerization of resin cement through ceramic. J Adhes Dent, 2014;16:129-135. [ Links ]
endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;4:942-948. [ Links ]
2015;17: 11-22 . Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392015000100003&lng=en&tlng=en [ Links ]
practice. Quintessence,1999:13-17. [ Links ]
51. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson A, Johansson A-K. Clinical decision making on extensive molar restorations. Oper Dent 2014;6:231-240. [ Links ]
52. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2009;25:960-968. [ Links ]