Abstract
No tiene
References
1. Weng D, Stock V, Schliephake H. Are socket and ridge preservation techniques at the day of tooth extraction efcient in maintaining the tissues of the alveolar ridge? Systematic review, consensus statements and recommendations of the 1st DGI consensus conference in september 2010, Aerzen, Germany. Eur J
Oral Implantol 2011; 4 (suppl): s59-s66.
2. Tan W, Wong T, Wong M, Lang N. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolarTaller 1 - Momento idóneo para la inserción del implante, inmediato, temprano o diferido 11 hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res. 23 (suppl. 5), 2012: 1-21.
3. Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212-218.
4. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio A. Relationship between the buccal bone plate thickness and the healing of postextraction Sockets With/Without Ridge Preservation. J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:211–217
5. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Salata L, Scombati S, Bresan E, Lang N. Flap vs. ‘‘flapless’’ surgical approach at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010 / 1314-1319
6. Chu S, Tarnow D. Managing esthetic challenges with anterior implants. Part 1: Midfacial recession defects from etiology to resolution. Compendium; 2013, 34 (No. spec, 7): 26-31
7. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte L, Buser D. Ridge alteraciones postextraction in the esthetic zone: A 3D analysis with CBCT. JDR Clinical Research Supplement, 2013; 92 (suppl Nº2): 195S- 201S.
8. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Tsesis I, Del Fabro M. Postextraction implant in sites with endodontic infection as an alternative to endodontic retratment: A review of literature. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39(3): 399-405.
9. Fugazzotto P. A retrospective analysis of immediately placed implants in 418 sites exhibiting periapical pathology: results and clinical considerations. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 192 – 202.
10. Feilong D, Hua Z, Hui Z, Haibin S, Qifen H, Peifen Z. A comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: A 1-year follow-up report. Int J.Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1036-1040.
11. Hämmerle Ch, Chen S, Wilson Jr.T. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; (19, supplement): 26-8
12. Juodzbalys G, Wang H. Socket MorphologyBased Treatment for Implant Esthetics: A Pilot Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 970 – 978.
13. Sanz I, García-Gargallo M, Herrera D, Martin C, Figuero E, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post – extraction sockets: a systematic review Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2012; 23 (Suppl.5): 67-79.
14. Chen S, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites.. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(suppl):186-217.
15. Buser D, Chapuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein M, Wittneben J, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser U. Long term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. JDR Clinical Research Supplement. 2013; 92 (suppl Nº2): 176S- 182S.
16. Martins Da Rosa JC. Restauración dentoalveolar inmediata. Ed Santos, 2012.
17. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferus J, Pjetursson E, Lang N, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010; 21: 13-21.
18. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson E, Lang N, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010; 21: 22-29.
19. Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio-Oss Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6 month study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 22,2011: 1-8.
20. Hämmerle Ch, Araujo M, Simion M. Evidence–based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Impl Res.23 (Suppl. 5), 2012:80-82.
21. Chen S, Darby I, Reynolds E. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2007; 18: 552-562.
22. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martín C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Impl. Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 5): 22-38.
23. Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservación: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:1049-1061
24. Favero G, Botticelli D, Favero G, García B, Mainetti T, Lang N. Alveolar bony crest preservation at implants installed immediately after tooth extraction: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl. Res. 2003; 24: 7-12
Oral Implantol 2011; 4 (suppl): s59-s66.
2. Tan W, Wong T, Wong M, Lang N. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolarTaller 1 - Momento idóneo para la inserción del implante, inmediato, temprano o diferido 11 hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res. 23 (suppl. 5), 2012: 1-21.
3. Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212-218.
4. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio A. Relationship between the buccal bone plate thickness and the healing of postextraction Sockets With/Without Ridge Preservation. J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:211–217
5. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Salata L, Scombati S, Bresan E, Lang N. Flap vs. ‘‘flapless’’ surgical approach at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010 / 1314-1319
6. Chu S, Tarnow D. Managing esthetic challenges with anterior implants. Part 1: Midfacial recession defects from etiology to resolution. Compendium; 2013, 34 (No. spec, 7): 26-31
7. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte L, Buser D. Ridge alteraciones postextraction in the esthetic zone: A 3D analysis with CBCT. JDR Clinical Research Supplement, 2013; 92 (suppl Nº2): 195S- 201S.
8. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Tsesis I, Del Fabro M. Postextraction implant in sites with endodontic infection as an alternative to endodontic retratment: A review of literature. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39(3): 399-405.
9. Fugazzotto P. A retrospective analysis of immediately placed implants in 418 sites exhibiting periapical pathology: results and clinical considerations. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 192 – 202.
10. Feilong D, Hua Z, Hui Z, Haibin S, Qifen H, Peifen Z. A comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: A 1-year follow-up report. Int J.Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1036-1040.
11. Hämmerle Ch, Chen S, Wilson Jr.T. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; (19, supplement): 26-8
12. Juodzbalys G, Wang H. Socket MorphologyBased Treatment for Implant Esthetics: A Pilot Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 970 – 978.
13. Sanz I, García-Gargallo M, Herrera D, Martin C, Figuero E, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post – extraction sockets: a systematic review Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2012; 23 (Suppl.5): 67-79.
14. Chen S, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites.. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(suppl):186-217.
15. Buser D, Chapuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein M, Wittneben J, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser U. Long term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. JDR Clinical Research Supplement. 2013; 92 (suppl Nº2): 176S- 182S.
16. Martins Da Rosa JC. Restauración dentoalveolar inmediata. Ed Santos, 2012.
17. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferus J, Pjetursson E, Lang N, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010; 21: 13-21.
18. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson E, Lang N, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010; 21: 22-29.
19. Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio-Oss Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6 month study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 22,2011: 1-8.
20. Hämmerle Ch, Araujo M, Simion M. Evidence–based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Impl Res.23 (Suppl. 5), 2012:80-82.
21. Chen S, Darby I, Reynolds E. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2007; 18: 552-562.
22. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martín C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Impl. Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 5): 22-38.
23. Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservación: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:1049-1061
24. Favero G, Botticelli D, Favero G, García B, Mainetti T, Lang N. Alveolar bony crest preservation at implants installed immediately after tooth extraction: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl. Res. 2003; 24: 7-12