Keywords
peer review, expert evaluation, arbitration process.
How to Cite
Peer review process to ensure the quality of scientific journals. (2019). Odontoestomatología, 21(34), 74-77. https://doi.org/10.22592/ode2019n34a9
Abstract
The peer-review process is one of the main
pillars of scientific journals. It is a complex and rigorous activity conducted by
national or foreign experts, which allows
for a critical assessment of manuscripts.
In the health area, this process becomes
highly relevant, especially regarding assessing the credibility of the research results and the description of procedures
and resolution of cases.
References
1. Ladrón de Guerrera M, Hincapié J, Jaclman J,
Herrera O, Caballero CV. Revisión por pares,
¿Qué es y para qué sirve? Rev Cien Salud Uninorte 2008;24(2).
2. Nassi-Calo, L. Revisión por pares: modalidades,
pros y contras [online]. SciELO en Perspectiva,
2015. Disponible en: https://blog.scielo.org/
es/2015/03/27/revision-por-pares-modalidades-pros-y-contras/
3. SciELO Guidelines: The Peer Review Process
in Journal Publishing. Version September
2018.Disponible en: https://docs.google.com/
document/d/1iTmddgQqqbZGqBLHst1r40m
owkCsAHEpKcNhtYIGnW0/edit?usp=sharing
4. Committee on Publication Ethics –COPE.
Disponible en: https://publicationethics.org/se
arch?t=plagiarism&type%5B%5D=Guidelines
&sort=score
Herrera O, Caballero CV. Revisión por pares,
¿Qué es y para qué sirve? Rev Cien Salud Uninorte 2008;24(2).
2. Nassi-Calo, L. Revisión por pares: modalidades,
pros y contras [online]. SciELO en Perspectiva,
2015. Disponible en: https://blog.scielo.org/
es/2015/03/27/revision-por-pares-modalidades-pros-y-contras/
3. SciELO Guidelines: The Peer Review Process
in Journal Publishing. Version September
2018.Disponible en: https://docs.google.com/
document/d/1iTmddgQqqbZGqBLHst1r40m
owkCsAHEpKcNhtYIGnW0/edit?usp=sharing
4. Committee on Publication Ethics –COPE.
Disponible en: https://publicationethics.org/se
arch?t=plagiarism&type%5B%5D=Guidelines
&sort=score