Palavras-chave
Postes Prefabricados de Fibra; Postes Estéticos, Postes Flexibles; Restauración del DET.
Como Citar
Postes prefabricados de fibra: Consideraciones para su uso clínico. (2010). Odontoestomatología, 12(No. especi), 4-22. https://odon.edu.uy/ojs/index.php/ode/article/view/230
Resumo
En la década de los 90 los Postes Prefabricados de Fibra (PPF) se introdujeron al mercado como alternativa a los sistemas metálicos o cerámicos. Hasta la fecha se mantienen en uso, modificando de manera constante sus presentaciones comerciales y estrategias de fijación. Sus cualidades mecánicas como su bajo Módulo Elástico (ME) similar al dentinario, introducen un nuevo paradigma en la rehabilitación del Diente Endodonticamente Tratado (DET): “el poste debe acompañar en forma solidaria la flexión de los tejidos dentarios frente a las cargas”. Sus actuales cualidades estéticas, la fácil remoción y la posibilidad de su cementado adhesivo, los han convertido en una alternativa válida a las soluciones convencionales. Sin embargo, algunos resultados contradictorios junto con la importante dificultad de lograr hibridación en la dentina radicular, mantienen interrogantes a resolver en el futuro. Se indican en casos en donde se prevea retratamiento, en pacientes jóvenes, de alta exigencia estética y toda vez que se quiera y pueda eludir los costos de aleaciones nobles. En el presente artículo se analizan los fundamentos clínicos y experimentales de distintos autores, extrapolándose consideraciones prácticas para su uso. Los mismos se ilustran en un caso clínico para un paciente joven, con antecedente de traumatismo y con altas expectativas estéticas.
Referências
Reeh E.H., Messner H.H., Douglas W.H.- Reduction of tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedure. J. Endodon 15:512, 1989.
Sorensen J.A., Martinoff J.F.- Clinically significant factors in dosel design. J Prosthet Dent, 54:28-34, 1984.
Howe CA. Mc Kendry DJ. Effect of endodontic acces preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. JADA 1990; 121-712-5.
Pereira JR., de Onelas F., Conti PC., do Valle AL. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95:50-54.
Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., Heitmann T.- Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27:275-278.
Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF, Intermitent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:153-158.
Fredriksson M., Astbäck J., Pamenius M., Arvidson K. A Restrospective Study of 236 Patients with Teeth Restored by Carbon Fiber-reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. J Prosth Dent 1998; 80: 151-7.
Ferrari M. et al. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am. J. Dernt. 2000; Vol.13:9b-13b.
Sorrentino R., Aversa R., Valeria Ferro, Auriemma T., Zarone F., Ferrar M., Apicella A. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Strain and Stress Distributions in Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors Restorated with Different Post, Core and Crown Materials. Dental Mat 2007; 23:983-993.
Fokkinga W.A., Kreulen C.M, Bronkhorst, Creugers N.H.- Up to 17 years controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Den, 35(10):778-786. Oct 2007.
Rosentritt M., Fürer C., Behr M., Lang R., Handel G. Comparison of „in vitro“ fracture strength of metalic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:595-601.
Dietschi D., Duc O., Krejci I., Sadan A. Biomecanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of literature, Part II ( Evaluation of fatigue behaviour, interfaces, and “in vivo” studies). Quintessence Int. 2008 Feb;39(2):117-29.
Hayashi M., Sugeta A., Takahashi Y., Imazato S., Ebisu S. Static and Fatigue Fracture Resistances of puplpless Teeth Restored with Post-Cores. Dental Mat 2008; 24:1178-1186.
Mc Laren J. D., Mc Laren C. I., Yaman P., Bin-Shuwaish M. S., Dennison J. D., Mc Donald N. J. The Effect of Post Type and Length on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:174-182.
Turell J.C. Rehabilitaciones Dentarias. Edit. Mundi 1976.
Re D., Cerutti A., Mangani F., Putignano A. Restauraciones Estéticas-Adhesivas Indirectas Parciales en Sectores Posteriores. Ed. AMOLCA 2009. Borer R. E., Britto L. R., Haddix J. E. Effect of Dowel Length on the Retention of 2 Different Prefabricated Posts. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:173.e 164-168.
Rengo S. Importanza dell’interfaccia elastica nel restauro degli elementi dentari trattati endodónticamente con perni di carbonio. G. It. Endo. 1998; Vol.4:216-221.
Borer R. E., Britto L. R., Haddix J. E. Effect of Dowel Length on the Retention of 2 Different Prefabricated Posts. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:173.e 164-168.
Albashaireh ZS., Ghazal M., Kern M. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan; 103(1):31-9.
Conceiçâo Nocchi E. Odontología restauradora. Salud y estética. Edit. Med. Panamericana 2º Edicción, 2008.
Coniglio I., Garcìa-Godoy F., Mgni E., Carvalho CA., Ferrari M. Resin cement thickness in oval –sheped canals: oval vs. circular fiber posts in combination with different tips/drills for post space preparation. Am J Dent. 2009 Oct.; 22(5):290-4.
Maceri F., Martignoni M., Vairo G. Mecanical behavior of Endodontica Restorations with Multiple Prefabricated Posts: A finite-element Approache . J of Biomechanics 2007; 40:2386-2398.
Porciani PF., Grandini S., Papacchini F., Goracci C., Ferrari M. The fit of two fiber posts into the root canal space enlarged with rotary NiTi files at four different levels. IDSA 2006.
Roberts H. W., Leonard D. L., Vandewalle K. S., Cohen M. C., Charlton D.G. The Effect of a Translucent Post on Resin Composit Depth of Cure. Dental Mat 2004; 20:617-622.
Seefeld, Wenz H-J, Ludwig K, Kern M. Resistence to Fracture and Structural Characteristics of Different Fiber Reinforced Post Systems. Dental Mat 2002; 23:265-271.
Rijk W. Removal of fiber posts from endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 2000; 13:19B-21B.
Bertoldhi A. Postes Radiculares de Base Orgánica: Ventajas y Limitaciones. RAOA 2005; vol 93, n°1:65-73.
Dallari A., Rovatti L., Dallari B., Masson P. N. Translucent Quartz-Fiber Post Luted “in vivo” with Self-curing Composite Cement: Case Report and Microscopic Examination at Two-years Clinical Follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8:189-195.
Pirani C., Chersoni S., Foschi F., Piana G., Loushine R. J., Tay F. R., Prati C. Does Hybridization of Intraradicular Dentin Really Improve Fiber Post Retention in Endodontically Treated Teeth?. JOE, Dic. 2005; vol. 31, n°12.
Bresci L., Mazzoni A., Ruggeri A., Cadenaro M., Di Lenarda R., De Steffano Dorigo E. Dental Adhesión Review: Aging and Stability of the Bonded Interface. Dental Mat 2008; 24:90-101.
Ferrari M., Mason P. N., Goraccci C., Pashley D. H., Tay F. R. Collagen Degradation in Edodontically Treated Teeth After Clinical Function. J Dent Res 2004; 83(5):414-419
Hagge M., Wong RD., Lindemuth JS. Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer based composite cement in canals obtured using a eugenol sealer. Am J Dent Dec 2002; 15(6):378-82.
Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKI et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self cured or dual-cured composites. Part I Single-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:27-40.
Wu H., Ayayashi M., Okamura K., Koytchev EV., Imazato S., Tanaka S., Sano H., Ebisu S. Effects of light penetration and smear lsyer removal on adhesion of post-cores to root canal dentin by self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater. 2009 Dec; 25(12): 1484-92.
Jongsma L. A., Bolhuis P. B., Pllav P., Felzer A. j., Kleverlaan C. J. Benefits of a Two-Steps Cementation Procedure for Prefabricated Fiber Posts. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12:55-62.
Grandini S., Sapio S., Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:243-7.
Demiryürek EO., Kúlünk S., Saraç D., Yüksel G., Bulucu B. Effect of different surfaces treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80.
Malik Y., Kaaden C., Hickel R., Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root canal dentine: a cross sectional study. Int Endod J. 2010 Jan; 43(1):47-56.
Radovic I., Corciolani G., MAgni E., Krstanovic G., Pavlovic V., Vulicevic ZR., Ferrari M. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement.
Kivanç BH., Görgül G. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1; 9(7):33-40.
Onay EO., Korkmaz Y., Kiremitci A. Effect of adhesive system type and trot region on the push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts to radicular dentine. Int Endod J. 2010 Apr; 43(4):259-68.
Toman M., Toksavul S., Sarikanat M., Nergiz I., Schmage P. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010 Mar; 18(1): 23-30.
Aksornmuang J., Nakajima M., Panyayong W, Tagami J. Effects of photocuring strategy on bonding of dual-cure on one-step self-etch adhesive to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J.2009 Mar;28(2):133-41.
Carvalho CA., Monticelli F., Cantoro A., Breschi L., Ferrari M. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts luted with unfilled resin cement. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Feb; 11(!):65-70.
Bauman M.A., Beer R. Endodoncia. Edit. Elvesier. España, 2da ed. 2008. Págs. 275-260.
Bonfante E. A., Pegoraro L. F., Góes M. F., Carvalho R. M. SEM Observation of the Bond Integrity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts Cemented Into Root Canals. Dental Mat 2008; 24:483-491.
Ferrari M., Vichi A., Grandini S. – Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: A SEM investigation. Dent Mater, 17:422-429, 2001.
Peng Liu, Xu-L. iang Deng, Xin-Zhi Wang. Use of a Cad/Cam-Fabricated Glass Fiber Post and Core to Restore Fractured Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Report. J. Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 330-333.
Gomes JC., Kina S. La adhesión en prostodoncia fija. Cap. XIV del libro “Adhesión en Odontología Restauradora “. 2003. Editor Gilberto Henostroza Haro. Editora Maio. Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.
Bittner N., Hill T., Randi A. Evaluation of a One-Piece Milled Zirconia Post and Core with Different Post-and-Core Systems: An “in vitro” Study. J Prosteth Dent 2010; 103:369-379.
Naumann M., Sterzenbac G., Alexandra F., Dietrich T. Randomized Controlled Clinical Pilot Trial of Titanium vs. Glass Fiber Prefabricated Posts: Preliminary Result After up to 3 Years. Int J Prosthod 2007; 20:499-503.
Beck N., Graef F., Wichmann M., Karl M. “In vitro” Fracture Resistance of Copy-milled Zirconia Ceramic Posts. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:40-44.
Xi H., Qiang Y., Za Zhi X. Prefabricated Posts Fiber. (Fracture behavior of mandibular premolars with flared root canals restored with different post-and-core systems and root rehabilitation). Dent Mat Sep 2010; 26(9):901-7.
Goodacre C. J. Review Analysis and Evaluation. Carbon fiber posts may have fewer failures than metal posts. J Evid Base Dent Pract 2010; 10: 32-34.
Ahed M., Al-Wahadni. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: “in vitro” study. Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:e77-e83.
Barguil J., Chica E., Latorre F. Distribución de los Esfuerzos en Tres Tipos de Elementos Intrarradiculares con Diferentes Longitudes. Rev. Fac. Odontol. Univ. Antioq. 2008; 19 (2): 24-37.
Gómez- Polo M., Llidó B., Rivero A., del Río J., Celemín A. A 10-Year Retrospective Study of the Survival Rate of Teeth Restored with Metal Prefabricated Posts vs. Cast Metal Posts and Cores. J of Dentistry 2010; 38: 916-920.
Goracci C., Fabianelli A., Sadek F.T., Papacchini F., Tay F.R., Ferrari M. The Contribution of Friction to the Dislocation Resistance of Bonded Fiber Posts. JOE Aug 2005; vol.331, n°8: 608-612.
Bonfante E. A., Pegoraro L. F., Góes M. F., Carvalho R. M. SEM Observation of the Bond Integrity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts Cemented Into Root Canals. Dental Mat 2008; 24:483-491.
Bitter K., Kielbassa A. M. Adhesivos Dentinarios en Conductos Radiculares. Quintessen.2007; 56(10):1045-52.
Borgia E. Selección del procedimiento terapéutico restaurador: enfoque filosófico y científico-técnico de una inquietante decisión. Anales del 2do Congreso Inter. de SUODIB. Jun 2009;59-61.
Pérez E. Estrategias adhesivas a la dentina radicular. Anales del 2do Congreso Inter. de SUODIB. Jun 2009; pág. 44.
Perdigâo J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber post. Dental Materials 2006; 22: 752-758.
Jongsma LA, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of surface pre-treatment of fiber posts on cement delamination. Dental Materials 2010; 26:901-907.
Sorensen J.A., Martinoff J.F.- Clinically significant factors in dosel design. J Prosthet Dent, 54:28-34, 1984.
Howe CA. Mc Kendry DJ. Effect of endodontic acces preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. JADA 1990; 121-712-5.
Pereira JR., de Onelas F., Conti PC., do Valle AL. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95:50-54.
Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., Heitmann T.- Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27:275-278.
Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF, Intermitent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:153-158.
Fredriksson M., Astbäck J., Pamenius M., Arvidson K. A Restrospective Study of 236 Patients with Teeth Restored by Carbon Fiber-reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. J Prosth Dent 1998; 80: 151-7.
Ferrari M. et al. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am. J. Dernt. 2000; Vol.13:9b-13b.
Sorrentino R., Aversa R., Valeria Ferro, Auriemma T., Zarone F., Ferrar M., Apicella A. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Strain and Stress Distributions in Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors Restorated with Different Post, Core and Crown Materials. Dental Mat 2007; 23:983-993.
Fokkinga W.A., Kreulen C.M, Bronkhorst, Creugers N.H.- Up to 17 years controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Den, 35(10):778-786. Oct 2007.
Rosentritt M., Fürer C., Behr M., Lang R., Handel G. Comparison of „in vitro“ fracture strength of metalic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:595-601.
Dietschi D., Duc O., Krejci I., Sadan A. Biomecanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of literature, Part II ( Evaluation of fatigue behaviour, interfaces, and “in vivo” studies). Quintessence Int. 2008 Feb;39(2):117-29.
Hayashi M., Sugeta A., Takahashi Y., Imazato S., Ebisu S. Static and Fatigue Fracture Resistances of puplpless Teeth Restored with Post-Cores. Dental Mat 2008; 24:1178-1186.
Mc Laren J. D., Mc Laren C. I., Yaman P., Bin-Shuwaish M. S., Dennison J. D., Mc Donald N. J. The Effect of Post Type and Length on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:174-182.
Turell J.C. Rehabilitaciones Dentarias. Edit. Mundi 1976.
Re D., Cerutti A., Mangani F., Putignano A. Restauraciones Estéticas-Adhesivas Indirectas Parciales en Sectores Posteriores. Ed. AMOLCA 2009. Borer R. E., Britto L. R., Haddix J. E. Effect of Dowel Length on the Retention of 2 Different Prefabricated Posts. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:173.e 164-168.
Rengo S. Importanza dell’interfaccia elastica nel restauro degli elementi dentari trattati endodónticamente con perni di carbonio. G. It. Endo. 1998; Vol.4:216-221.
Borer R. E., Britto L. R., Haddix J. E. Effect of Dowel Length on the Retention of 2 Different Prefabricated Posts. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:173.e 164-168.
Albashaireh ZS., Ghazal M., Kern M. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan; 103(1):31-9.
Conceiçâo Nocchi E. Odontología restauradora. Salud y estética. Edit. Med. Panamericana 2º Edicción, 2008.
Coniglio I., Garcìa-Godoy F., Mgni E., Carvalho CA., Ferrari M. Resin cement thickness in oval –sheped canals: oval vs. circular fiber posts in combination with different tips/drills for post space preparation. Am J Dent. 2009 Oct.; 22(5):290-4.
Maceri F., Martignoni M., Vairo G. Mecanical behavior of Endodontica Restorations with Multiple Prefabricated Posts: A finite-element Approache . J of Biomechanics 2007; 40:2386-2398.
Porciani PF., Grandini S., Papacchini F., Goracci C., Ferrari M. The fit of two fiber posts into the root canal space enlarged with rotary NiTi files at four different levels. IDSA 2006.
Roberts H. W., Leonard D. L., Vandewalle K. S., Cohen M. C., Charlton D.G. The Effect of a Translucent Post on Resin Composit Depth of Cure. Dental Mat 2004; 20:617-622.
Seefeld, Wenz H-J, Ludwig K, Kern M. Resistence to Fracture and Structural Characteristics of Different Fiber Reinforced Post Systems. Dental Mat 2002; 23:265-271.
Rijk W. Removal of fiber posts from endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 2000; 13:19B-21B.
Bertoldhi A. Postes Radiculares de Base Orgánica: Ventajas y Limitaciones. RAOA 2005; vol 93, n°1:65-73.
Dallari A., Rovatti L., Dallari B., Masson P. N. Translucent Quartz-Fiber Post Luted “in vivo” with Self-curing Composite Cement: Case Report and Microscopic Examination at Two-years Clinical Follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8:189-195.
Pirani C., Chersoni S., Foschi F., Piana G., Loushine R. J., Tay F. R., Prati C. Does Hybridization of Intraradicular Dentin Really Improve Fiber Post Retention in Endodontically Treated Teeth?. JOE, Dic. 2005; vol. 31, n°12.
Bresci L., Mazzoni A., Ruggeri A., Cadenaro M., Di Lenarda R., De Steffano Dorigo E. Dental Adhesión Review: Aging and Stability of the Bonded Interface. Dental Mat 2008; 24:90-101.
Ferrari M., Mason P. N., Goraccci C., Pashley D. H., Tay F. R. Collagen Degradation in Edodontically Treated Teeth After Clinical Function. J Dent Res 2004; 83(5):414-419
Hagge M., Wong RD., Lindemuth JS. Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer based composite cement in canals obtured using a eugenol sealer. Am J Dent Dec 2002; 15(6):378-82.
Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKI et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self cured or dual-cured composites. Part I Single-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:27-40.
Wu H., Ayayashi M., Okamura K., Koytchev EV., Imazato S., Tanaka S., Sano H., Ebisu S. Effects of light penetration and smear lsyer removal on adhesion of post-cores to root canal dentin by self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater. 2009 Dec; 25(12): 1484-92.
Jongsma L. A., Bolhuis P. B., Pllav P., Felzer A. j., Kleverlaan C. J. Benefits of a Two-Steps Cementation Procedure for Prefabricated Fiber Posts. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12:55-62.
Grandini S., Sapio S., Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:243-7.
Demiryürek EO., Kúlünk S., Saraç D., Yüksel G., Bulucu B. Effect of different surfaces treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80.
Malik Y., Kaaden C., Hickel R., Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root canal dentine: a cross sectional study. Int Endod J. 2010 Jan; 43(1):47-56.
Radovic I., Corciolani G., MAgni E., Krstanovic G., Pavlovic V., Vulicevic ZR., Ferrari M. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement.
Kivanç BH., Görgül G. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1; 9(7):33-40.
Onay EO., Korkmaz Y., Kiremitci A. Effect of adhesive system type and trot region on the push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts to radicular dentine. Int Endod J. 2010 Apr; 43(4):259-68.
Toman M., Toksavul S., Sarikanat M., Nergiz I., Schmage P. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010 Mar; 18(1): 23-30.
Aksornmuang J., Nakajima M., Panyayong W, Tagami J. Effects of photocuring strategy on bonding of dual-cure on one-step self-etch adhesive to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J.2009 Mar;28(2):133-41.
Carvalho CA., Monticelli F., Cantoro A., Breschi L., Ferrari M. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts luted with unfilled resin cement. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Feb; 11(!):65-70.
Bauman M.A., Beer R. Endodoncia. Edit. Elvesier. España, 2da ed. 2008. Págs. 275-260.
Bonfante E. A., Pegoraro L. F., Góes M. F., Carvalho R. M. SEM Observation of the Bond Integrity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts Cemented Into Root Canals. Dental Mat 2008; 24:483-491.
Ferrari M., Vichi A., Grandini S. – Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: A SEM investigation. Dent Mater, 17:422-429, 2001.
Peng Liu, Xu-L. iang Deng, Xin-Zhi Wang. Use of a Cad/Cam-Fabricated Glass Fiber Post and Core to Restore Fractured Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Report. J. Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 330-333.
Gomes JC., Kina S. La adhesión en prostodoncia fija. Cap. XIV del libro “Adhesión en Odontología Restauradora “. 2003. Editor Gilberto Henostroza Haro. Editora Maio. Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.
Bittner N., Hill T., Randi A. Evaluation of a One-Piece Milled Zirconia Post and Core with Different Post-and-Core Systems: An “in vitro” Study. J Prosteth Dent 2010; 103:369-379.
Naumann M., Sterzenbac G., Alexandra F., Dietrich T. Randomized Controlled Clinical Pilot Trial of Titanium vs. Glass Fiber Prefabricated Posts: Preliminary Result After up to 3 Years. Int J Prosthod 2007; 20:499-503.
Beck N., Graef F., Wichmann M., Karl M. “In vitro” Fracture Resistance of Copy-milled Zirconia Ceramic Posts. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:40-44.
Xi H., Qiang Y., Za Zhi X. Prefabricated Posts Fiber. (Fracture behavior of mandibular premolars with flared root canals restored with different post-and-core systems and root rehabilitation). Dent Mat Sep 2010; 26(9):901-7.
Goodacre C. J. Review Analysis and Evaluation. Carbon fiber posts may have fewer failures than metal posts. J Evid Base Dent Pract 2010; 10: 32-34.
Ahed M., Al-Wahadni. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: “in vitro” study. Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:e77-e83.
Barguil J., Chica E., Latorre F. Distribución de los Esfuerzos en Tres Tipos de Elementos Intrarradiculares con Diferentes Longitudes. Rev. Fac. Odontol. Univ. Antioq. 2008; 19 (2): 24-37.
Gómez- Polo M., Llidó B., Rivero A., del Río J., Celemín A. A 10-Year Retrospective Study of the Survival Rate of Teeth Restored with Metal Prefabricated Posts vs. Cast Metal Posts and Cores. J of Dentistry 2010; 38: 916-920.
Goracci C., Fabianelli A., Sadek F.T., Papacchini F., Tay F.R., Ferrari M. The Contribution of Friction to the Dislocation Resistance of Bonded Fiber Posts. JOE Aug 2005; vol.331, n°8: 608-612.
Bonfante E. A., Pegoraro L. F., Góes M. F., Carvalho R. M. SEM Observation of the Bond Integrity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts Cemented Into Root Canals. Dental Mat 2008; 24:483-491.
Bitter K., Kielbassa A. M. Adhesivos Dentinarios en Conductos Radiculares. Quintessen.2007; 56(10):1045-52.
Borgia E. Selección del procedimiento terapéutico restaurador: enfoque filosófico y científico-técnico de una inquietante decisión. Anales del 2do Congreso Inter. de SUODIB. Jun 2009;59-61.
Pérez E. Estrategias adhesivas a la dentina radicular. Anales del 2do Congreso Inter. de SUODIB. Jun 2009; pág. 44.
Perdigâo J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber post. Dental Materials 2006; 22: 752-758.
Jongsma LA, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of surface pre-treatment of fiber posts on cement delamination. Dental Materials 2010; 26:901-907.