Palavras-chave
clorexidina, microtração, metaloproteinases, camada híbrida.
Como Citar
Avaliação da resistência de união à dentina humana de um sistema adesivo universal com clorexidina utilizado no modo de condicionamento total e autocondicionante. (2020). Odontoestomatología, 22(35), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.22592/10.22592/ode2020n35a4
Resumo
Objetivos: Avaliar a resistência de união
á microtração na dentina humana de um
sistema adesivo universal com clorexidina
na sua composição, no modo de
condicionamento total em dois passos e no
modo autocondicionante.
Metodologia: 20 terceiros molares foram
divididos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos,
de acordo com o tipo de sistema adesivo
utilizado (Single Bond Universal®, 3MESPE
e Peak Universal Bond®, Ultradent Products)
e modo de uso (condicionamento total e
autocondicionante). Os corpos de prova
criados foram submetidos ao teste de
microtração utilizando uma máquina de
ensaios universal.
Resultados: Não foram encontradas
diferenças estatisticamente significativas
entre os quatro grupos estudados.
Conclusões: A resistência de união da resina
composta à dentina humana não foi afetada
pelo uso de um sistema adesivo universal
contendo clorexidina em sua composição,
aplicado nos modos de condicionamento
total ou autocondicionamento.
Referências
1. Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL,
Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite
resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative
material. J Dent. 2012; 40 (9): 703-10.
2. Bedran-Russo A, Leme-Kraus AA, Vidal CMP,
Teixeira EC. An Overview of Dental Adhesive
Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface.
Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61 (4):
713-731.
3. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo
U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental
adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the
universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8
(1):1-17.
4. Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, Murayama
R, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Enamel
bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: Influence
of surface energy characteristics. J Dent.
2010; 38 (2):123–30.
5. Mandri MN, Aguirre Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio
ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología
Restauradora. Odon. 2015; 17 (26): 50–6.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A,
Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J.
Relationship between bond-strength tests and
clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2):
100–21.
7. Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Seyed Tabai E, MohammadiBasir
M. Bonding Durability of Four Adhesive
Systems. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12 (8):
563–70.
8. Dourado Loguercio A, Reis A. Sistemas Adhesivos.
RevOperDent y BiomaterDent y Biomater.
2006; 1 (2): 13-28
9. Hernández JM. Aspectos prácticos de la adhesión
a dentina Practicalaspects in dentinaladhesion.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (1):
19–32.
10. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M,
Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley
DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch
and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected
dentine. J Dent. 2003; 31 (7): 469–77.
11. Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF,
Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling
J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley. In vivo preservation
of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J
Dent Res. 2007; 86 (6): 529–33.
12. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe
LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence
of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A selfetching
primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent
Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 758-67.
13. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain M V. Direct comparison
of the bond strength results of the different
test methods: a critical literature review.
Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2): e78-93.
14. Bader Mattar M, Ibáñez Musalem M. Evaluación
de la interfase adhesiva obtenida en restauraciones
de resina compuesta realizadas con un
sistema adhesivo universal utilizado con y sin
grabado ácido previo. Rev Clínica Periodoncia,
Implantol y Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (3): 115–22.
15. Pomacóndor-Hernández C. Papel de la clorhexidina
en la odontología restauradora. Odontol
San Maquina. 2010; 13 (2): 46–9.
16. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix
metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the
bond durability of universal dental adhesives?
Scanning. 2016; 38 (6): 535–44.
17. Vola J. Influencia de los inhibidores de las metaloproteinasas,
agentes reticuladores y remineralizaciónbiomimética
en la longevidad de
la unión adhesiva. Actas Odon. 2014; 11 (2):
10–21.
18. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima
M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay
F. The microtensilebond test: a review. J Adhes
Dent. 1999; 1 (4): 299–309.
19. International Organization for Standarization.
ISO 4049:2009 Dentistry Polymer based restorative
materials. 2009.
20. Leite ML de A e. S, Costa CA de S, Duarte RM,
de Andrade AKM, Soares DG. Bond strength
and cytotoxicity of a universal adhesive according
to the hybridization strategies to dentin.
Braz Dent J. 2018; 29 (1): 68-75.
21. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio
AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding
properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J
Dent. 2013; 41 (5): 404-11.
22. Sanchez F, Osorio R, Toledano M. Control del
colapso del colágeno: sistemas autograbadores.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (4): 175–83.
23. Parra Lozada M, Rayo HG. Sistemas adhesivos
autograbadores, resistencia de unión y nanofiltración:
una revisión self-etchingadhesivesystems,
bond strength and nanofiltration: a review.
Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2012;
24 (24): 133-150.
24. Roopa D ARS, D R. por Roopa D; Rao A.
Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy
of Seventh Generation Bonding Agent and
Peak Universal Bond: An In-Vitro Study. JBR J
Interdiscip Med Dent Sci. 2015; 03 (02): 1–4.
Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite
resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative
material. J Dent. 2012; 40 (9): 703-10.
2. Bedran-Russo A, Leme-Kraus AA, Vidal CMP,
Teixeira EC. An Overview of Dental Adhesive
Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface.
Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61 (4):
713-731.
3. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo
U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental
adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the
universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8
(1):1-17.
4. Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, Murayama
R, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Enamel
bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: Influence
of surface energy characteristics. J Dent.
2010; 38 (2):123–30.
5. Mandri MN, Aguirre Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio
ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología
Restauradora. Odon. 2015; 17 (26): 50–6.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A,
Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J.
Relationship between bond-strength tests and
clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2):
100–21.
7. Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Seyed Tabai E, MohammadiBasir
M. Bonding Durability of Four Adhesive
Systems. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12 (8):
563–70.
8. Dourado Loguercio A, Reis A. Sistemas Adhesivos.
RevOperDent y BiomaterDent y Biomater.
2006; 1 (2): 13-28
9. Hernández JM. Aspectos prácticos de la adhesión
a dentina Practicalaspects in dentinaladhesion.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (1):
19–32.
10. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M,
Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley
DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch
and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected
dentine. J Dent. 2003; 31 (7): 469–77.
11. Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF,
Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling
J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley. In vivo preservation
of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J
Dent Res. 2007; 86 (6): 529–33.
12. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe
LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence
of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A selfetching
primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent
Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 758-67.
13. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain M V. Direct comparison
of the bond strength results of the different
test methods: a critical literature review.
Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2): e78-93.
14. Bader Mattar M, Ibáñez Musalem M. Evaluación
de la interfase adhesiva obtenida en restauraciones
de resina compuesta realizadas con un
sistema adhesivo universal utilizado con y sin
grabado ácido previo. Rev Clínica Periodoncia,
Implantol y Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (3): 115–22.
15. Pomacóndor-Hernández C. Papel de la clorhexidina
en la odontología restauradora. Odontol
San Maquina. 2010; 13 (2): 46–9.
16. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix
metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the
bond durability of universal dental adhesives?
Scanning. 2016; 38 (6): 535–44.
17. Vola J. Influencia de los inhibidores de las metaloproteinasas,
agentes reticuladores y remineralizaciónbiomimética
en la longevidad de
la unión adhesiva. Actas Odon. 2014; 11 (2):
10–21.
18. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima
M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay
F. The microtensilebond test: a review. J Adhes
Dent. 1999; 1 (4): 299–309.
19. International Organization for Standarization.
ISO 4049:2009 Dentistry Polymer based restorative
materials. 2009.
20. Leite ML de A e. S, Costa CA de S, Duarte RM,
de Andrade AKM, Soares DG. Bond strength
and cytotoxicity of a universal adhesive according
to the hybridization strategies to dentin.
Braz Dent J. 2018; 29 (1): 68-75.
21. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio
AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding
properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J
Dent. 2013; 41 (5): 404-11.
22. Sanchez F, Osorio R, Toledano M. Control del
colapso del colágeno: sistemas autograbadores.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (4): 175–83.
23. Parra Lozada M, Rayo HG. Sistemas adhesivos
autograbadores, resistencia de unión y nanofiltración:
una revisión self-etchingadhesivesystems,
bond strength and nanofiltration: a review.
Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2012;
24 (24): 133-150.
24. Roopa D ARS, D R. por Roopa D; Rao A.
Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy
of Seventh Generation Bonding Agent and
Peak Universal Bond: An In-Vitro Study. JBR J
Interdiscip Med Dent Sci. 2015; 03 (02): 1–4.