Palavras-chave
Pesquisa
Estudantes
Percepção
Odontología
Educação
Estudantes
Percepção
Odontología
Educação
Como Citar
Perspectivas de graduandos em odontologia sobre a orientação da tese de bacharelado. (2022). Odontoestomatología, 24(39). https://doi.org/10.22592/ode2022n39e218
Resumo
Foram identificadas as perspectivas que os egressos têm sobre os processos de supervisão que tiveram com seus orientadores de tese. Estudo qualitativo cuja população foram graduandos da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Lima, Peru), por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas. As categorias do estudo foram relacionadas ao planejamento das atividades com o supervisor, decisões do supervisor e percepções gerais sobre o supervisor. Dos 20 entrevistados, 12 (60%) eram mulheres. O planejamento foi apontado como um dos elementos pouco discutidos com a assessoria, a maioria indicou que nunca teve uma primeira reunião para coordenar como seriam as sessões de assessoria. A percepção dos orientadores de tese não é adequada por parte dos alunos de Odontologia. Os principais aspectos negativos foram relacionados à falta de planejamento das atividades e reuniões.
Referências
1. Diez C, Arkenau C, Meyer-Wentrup F. Why German medical students abandon dissertations. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000;13:97-100. [ Links ]
2. Kuhnigk O, Reissner V, Böthern AM. Criteria for the successful completion of medical dissertations-a multicenter study. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27:45. [ Links ]
3. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara-Verástegui, R. Experiencias y percepciones de los graduados de Odontología sobre la culminación de la tesis en una universidad del Perú. Odontol. Sanmarquina. 2021;24(3): 235-241. [ Links ]
4. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Relación entre enfoque de supervisión y satisfacción de la tesis universitaria en Odontología-ODOVTOS-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2021. En prensa. [ Links ]
5. Long A, Bischoff WR, Aduddell K. Research Prescription for Undergraduate Students: Research Mentoring in a Small Liberal Arts University. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35(3):170-173. [ Links ]
6. Morales OA, Rincón AG, Tona RJ. Cómo enseñar a investigar en la universidad. Revista EDUCERE. 2005; 9(29): 217 - 224. de Kleijn RAM, Meijer PC, Brekelmans M, Pilot A. Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors' practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development. 2015;34(1): 117-130. [ Links ]
8. de Kleijn RAM, Meijer PC, Brekelmans M, Pilot A. Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors' practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development. 2015;34(1): 117-130. [ Links ]
7. Craig PA. Lessons from my undergraduate research students. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(27):10447-10452. [ Links ]
8. Sawatsky AP, Ratelle JT, Beckman TJ. Qualitative Research Methods in Medical Education. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(1):14-22. [ Links ]
9. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th edition). SAGE Publications. 2021. [ Links ]
10. Carruyo CJ. Conversando con tutores y asesores de tesis. Revista Visión Gerencial. 2007; 6: 45-54. [ Links ]
11. Ali J, Ullah H, Sanauddin N. Postgraduate Research Supervision: Exploring the Lived Experience of Pakistani Postgraduate Students. FWU J Soc Sci 2019;13 (1): 14-25. [ Links ]
12. Agricola BT, Prins MF, van Tartwijk J. Supervisor and Student Perspectives on Undergraduate Thesis Supervision in Higher Education. Scand J Educ Res 2020; 1-21. [ Links ]
13. Clark CM, Peterson PL. Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). American Educational Research Association. 1986. [ Links ]
14. Orsmond P, Merry S. Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors' and students' understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2011; 36(2): 125-136. [ Links ]
15. Chamberlain S. Ten types of PhD supervisor relationships - which is yours? 2016. Disponible en: https://theconversation.com/ten-types-of-phd-supervisor-relationships-which-is-yours-52967. [ Links ]
16. Chireshe R. Research Supervision: Postgraduate Students' Experiences in South Africa. J Soc Sci 2017;31(2): 229-234. [ Links ]
17. Grant K, Hackney R, Edgar D. Research Supervision: an 'agreed' view of metaphors and conceptual model, International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2014; 1(1):1-20. [ Links ]
18. Kimani NE. Challenges in Quality Control for Postgraduate Supervision. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education. 2014; 1(9): 63-70 [ Links ]
19. Reeve J, Ryan R, Deci EL, Jang H. Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 223-244). Routledge. 2021. [ Links ]
20. Vehviläinen S. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scand J Educ Res 2009; 53(2): 185-201. [ Links ]
21. Heyns T, Bresser P, Buys T, Coetzee I, Korkie E, White Z, Mc Cormack B. Twelve tips for supervisors to move towards person-centered research supervision in health care sciences. Med Teach. 2019;41(12):1353-1358. [ Links ]
22. Jackson D, Davison I, Adams R, Edordu A, Picton A. A systematic review of supervisory relationships in general practitioner training. Med Educ. 2019;53(9):874-885. [ Links ]
2. Kuhnigk O, Reissner V, Böthern AM. Criteria for the successful completion of medical dissertations-a multicenter study. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27:45. [ Links ]
3. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara-Verástegui, R. Experiencias y percepciones de los graduados de Odontología sobre la culminación de la tesis en una universidad del Perú. Odontol. Sanmarquina. 2021;24(3): 235-241. [ Links ]
4. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Relación entre enfoque de supervisión y satisfacción de la tesis universitaria en Odontología-ODOVTOS-Int. J. Dental Sc. 2021. En prensa. [ Links ]
5. Long A, Bischoff WR, Aduddell K. Research Prescription for Undergraduate Students: Research Mentoring in a Small Liberal Arts University. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35(3):170-173. [ Links ]
6. Morales OA, Rincón AG, Tona RJ. Cómo enseñar a investigar en la universidad. Revista EDUCERE. 2005; 9(29): 217 - 224. de Kleijn RAM, Meijer PC, Brekelmans M, Pilot A. Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors' practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development. 2015;34(1): 117-130. [ Links ]
8. de Kleijn RAM, Meijer PC, Brekelmans M, Pilot A. Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors' practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development. 2015;34(1): 117-130. [ Links ]
7. Craig PA. Lessons from my undergraduate research students. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(27):10447-10452. [ Links ]
8. Sawatsky AP, Ratelle JT, Beckman TJ. Qualitative Research Methods in Medical Education. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(1):14-22. [ Links ]
9. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th edition). SAGE Publications. 2021. [ Links ]
10. Carruyo CJ. Conversando con tutores y asesores de tesis. Revista Visión Gerencial. 2007; 6: 45-54. [ Links ]
11. Ali J, Ullah H, Sanauddin N. Postgraduate Research Supervision: Exploring the Lived Experience of Pakistani Postgraduate Students. FWU J Soc Sci 2019;13 (1): 14-25. [ Links ]
12. Agricola BT, Prins MF, van Tartwijk J. Supervisor and Student Perspectives on Undergraduate Thesis Supervision in Higher Education. Scand J Educ Res 2020; 1-21. [ Links ]
13. Clark CM, Peterson PL. Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). American Educational Research Association. 1986. [ Links ]
14. Orsmond P, Merry S. Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors' and students' understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2011; 36(2): 125-136. [ Links ]
15. Chamberlain S. Ten types of PhD supervisor relationships - which is yours? 2016. Disponible en: https://theconversation.com/ten-types-of-phd-supervisor-relationships-which-is-yours-52967. [ Links ]
16. Chireshe R. Research Supervision: Postgraduate Students' Experiences in South Africa. J Soc Sci 2017;31(2): 229-234. [ Links ]
17. Grant K, Hackney R, Edgar D. Research Supervision: an 'agreed' view of metaphors and conceptual model, International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2014; 1(1):1-20. [ Links ]
18. Kimani NE. Challenges in Quality Control for Postgraduate Supervision. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education. 2014; 1(9): 63-70 [ Links ]
19. Reeve J, Ryan R, Deci EL, Jang H. Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 223-244). Routledge. 2021. [ Links ]
20. Vehviläinen S. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scand J Educ Res 2009; 53(2): 185-201. [ Links ]
21. Heyns T, Bresser P, Buys T, Coetzee I, Korkie E, White Z, Mc Cormack B. Twelve tips for supervisors to move towards person-centered research supervision in health care sciences. Med Teach. 2019;41(12):1353-1358. [ Links ]
22. Jackson D, Davison I, Adams R, Edordu A, Picton A. A systematic review of supervisory relationships in general practitioner training. Med Educ. 2019;53(9):874-885. [ Links ]